Sin is a topic that rarely comes up in polite company. It is an unfortunate reality that sin is either avoided altogether in an attempt to not hurt someone or be judgmental or it is brandished as a weapon and is often accompanied by devaluing or disowning the person declared to be sinful. The strange thing is that both of these treatments of sin are backwards and are each unhealthy in very similar ways.

If you want to know how to address sin, you first have to know what sin is. The Bible uses several words for sin, but for the sake of this post I will focus on the most commonly
use: peccatum. Peccatum means to miss the mark or to act in a way that is contrary to hitting the mark; like an archer who misses his target or uses poor form. But unlike the archer, we cannot simply put down our bow and go find another hobby if we find it to difficult. We have no choice in coming into this world and by that same token we have no say in the goal or “mark” of this life. Our goal in life is righteous living and sin is our failure to do so. In a culture like ours where we give all young athletes trophies despite how they play and are banning red ink from graded papers, describing someone’s actions as missing the mark or failure to achieve the goal set for us may seem negative or just plain mean. However, pointing out someone’s sin as it has been defined here is actually an empowering and dignifying act. By telling someone that they have missed the mark we at the same time must believe that they have a mark to begin with and moreover that they are capable of hitting that mark. By pointing out a failure we have to acknowledge in that moment that the person who failed is meant for and capable of greatness!
When we avoid talking about sin or use sin as a weapon (not acknowledging the potential greatness) we degrade each other in two ways:
1. We deny that the other person is meant to be more than what they are now
2. We devalue greatness by treating it like an intrinsic state rather than an art or craft that we can develop and achieve.
In either case, whether you only point out good qualities or only point out bad you become irrational. If we are all the same and are all great then what is the point of saying so? You might as well compliment everyone by saying they have two nostrils or skin on the outside of our bodies. Likewise, if some people are disgusting sinners that can never be expected to be anything other than worthless, why bother telling them so? You might as well yell at water for being wet or swear at sand for being gritty. The point is that when we refuse to address one part of a person, either failures or greatness, we become unable to saying anything about them at all.
So what can we say to someone who has sinned? It seems that saying “it’s ok, you’re still a good person” isn’t helpful. Neither is saying, “you are such a failure.” There is certainly no one-size-fits-all response to sin, but perhaps the best way to start is to say, “you are meant for more than this.”
